Recent PostsForum Rules
Next Topic Sign In to ReplyPrev Topic
FirstPrev1234NextLast
Opinion: Western Democracy’s Future Depends on Israel’s Victory
101. Author: RobertHivelyDate: Sun, 4/21/2024, 6:52PM EST
rfenst wrote:
@ #99

Your replying to Hively, right?



You can take it. Lol I yield the floor.

I been done with this thread.

Post #48 is all I had to say.
102. Author: rfenstDate: Mon, 4/22/2024, 2:30PM EST
RobertHively wrote:
You can take it. Lol I yield the floor.

I been done with this thread.

Post #48 is all I had to say.

If I Too much were to take it, I'd have to deny and explain many of his accusations about MY opinions and beliefs.
I yield.
103. Author: RobertHivelyDate: Mon, 4/22/2024, 3:06PM EST
^

"If I Too much were to take it"?

Idk. SEE post #48. You asked for intent, I gave you the quote. Idk what else there is to say. horse

Jeebs, heard that cuz. We all have our own thoughts and opinions.
104. Author: RobertHivelyDate: Mon, 4/22/2024, 3:35PM EST
Fenster wrote in post #38: "As to all this "genocide" b.s., the legal concept of "intent" needs to be proven. Got any proof of "intent" to commit genocide?"

Hively wrote in post #48:
"Intent? Here's an excerpt from the article Ray posted:

"Netanyahu has also recently invoked Biblical language to “justify” his mass killing of Palestinians. In a public oration he quoted Samuel 15:3 saying, “You must remember what Amalek has done to you, says our Holy Bible.” And, quoting “Our Holy Bible”: “Now go and attack the Amalekites and totally destroy all that belongs to them. Do not spare them; put to death men and women, children and infants, cattle and sheep, camels and donkeys.”"
105. Author: RobertHivelyDate: Mon, 4/22/2024, 3:36PM EST
Article Ray posted: https://www.lewrockwell.com/2024/04/thomas-dilorenzo/palestinian-confederates/
106. Author: AbrignacDate: Mon, 4/22/2024, 4:56PM EST
RobertHively wrote:
Fenster wrote in post #38: "As to all this "genocide" b.s., the legal concept of "intent" needs to be proven. Got any proof of "intent" to commit genocide?"

Hively wrote in post #48:
"Intent? Here's an excerpt from the article Ray posted:

"Netanyahu has also recently invoked Biblical language to “justify” his mass killing of Palestinians. In a public oration he quoted Samuel 15:3 saying, “You must remember what Amalek has done to you, says our Holy Bible.” And, quoting “Our Holy Bible”: “Now go and attack the Amalekites and totally destroy all that belongs to them. Do not spare them; put to death men and women, children and infants, cattle and sheep, camels and donkeys.”"


Therin lies the problem. As I’ve said earlier people throughout history have relied on religious dogma to justify killing even after having been told not to kil.
107. Author: Speyside2Date: Mon, 4/22/2024, 7:24PM EST
A strange statement for Netanyahu to make. He is Jewish so he does not invoke biblical language, he would invoke Torah language. Also, Samuel 15:3 never mentions bible which would be an absurdity given that Samuel was Jewish. To the best of my recollection in 1546 the council of Trent issued the definitive answer on what books the bible should be made up of. The earlies books of the New Testament were written about 100 CE. The bible as we know it was not compiled until the 3rd and 4th centuries CE. So, the term bible would not have existed until this timeframe.

Perhaps you could find another source to establish intent as your first one seems inaccurate.
108. Author: RobertHivelyDate: Mon, 4/22/2024, 7:56PM EST
^
No I don't need to research this any further.

But you can confirm it if you want with a quick search of the internet or Youtube.
109. Author: jeeblingDate: Mon, 4/22/2024, 9:33PM EST
rfenst wrote:
@ #99

Your replying to Hively, right?

Yes
110. Author: Speyside2Date: Tue, 4/23/2024, 6:57PM EST
I would rather go right to the source; Bible is not a word ever used in the Bible. That also is a fact, you might want to check this by reading the Bible. Jing James, NIV, NLT, take your pick. The internet, and YouTube are not the Bible. Perhaps you have noticed this, perhaps you have not. A rather weak response on your part in my opinion. I suppose it was the best one possible given that you are unable to substantiate what you are claiming, as it does not exist.
111. Author: AbrignacDate: Tue, 4/23/2024, 7:39PM EST
Speyside2 wrote:
I would rather go right to the source; Bible is not a word ever used in the Bible. That also is a fact, you might want to check this by reading the Bible. Jing James, NIV, NLT, take your pick. The internet, and YouTube are not the Bible. Perhaps you have noticed this, perhaps you have not. A rather weak response on your part in my opinion. I suppose it was the best one possible given that you are unable to substantiate what you are claiming, as it does not exist.


I’m pretty sure one can find the verbatim text of every version you mentioned on the internet. As far as YouTube is concerned I’m sure one can find videos of a narrator reading each of those versions as well.
112. Author: jeeblingDate: Tue, 4/23/2024, 7:53PM EST
I am a sucker for the James Earl Jones reading but I also like some English dude whose name I can’t remember. He does a mean KJV though.
113. Author: jeeblingDate: Tue, 4/23/2024, 7:54PM EST
RobertHively wrote:
^

"If I Too much were to take it"?

Idk. SEE post #48. You asked for intent, I gave you the quote. Idk what else there is to say. horse

Jeebs, heard that cuz. We all have our own thoughts and opinions.


Herfing Beer
114. Author: RobertHivelyDate: Tue, 4/23/2024, 7:56PM EST
Abrignac wrote:
I’m pretty sure one can find the verbatim text of every version you mentioned on the internet. As far as YouTube is concerned I’m sure one can find videos of a narrator reading each of those versions as well.


He's just trolling. I think he's on that Killa Bread again.
115. Author: jeeblingDate: Tue, 4/23/2024, 7:59PM EST
😂
116. Author: RobertHivelyDate: Tue, 4/23/2024, 8:00PM EST
jeebling wrote:
Herfing Beer


What do you think about that quote, Jeebs?

Think Netanyahu intends to wipe out the Palestinians?



117. Author: RobertHivelyDate: Tue, 4/23/2024, 8:09PM EST
jeebling wrote:
Herfing Beer



Imo what he did was make a veiled genocidal threat toward the Palestinians last October(not just Hamas), using the Old Testament of the bible as a historical reference, and precedence.

South Africa (and others?) took Israel to the Hague (International Court of Justice) over this.

Based on Netanyahu's statements, statements from his cabinet, the IDF, the ICJ court arguments, and conditions on the ground, I think the Israeli govt, at least at one point, intended (intent) to wipe the Palestinians out. Genocide.

I'd guess they walk that back a little now considering they got taken to the Hague and the world is paying more attention than they were last fall. I hope that's the case, but maybe not. Time will tell.
118. Author: jeeblingDate: Tue, 4/23/2024, 8:22PM EST
RobertHively wrote:
Imo what he did was make a veiled genocidal threat toward the Palestinians last October(not just Hamas), using the Old Testament of the bible as a historical reference, and precedence.

South Africa (and others?) took Israel to the Hague (International Court of Justice) over this.

Based on Netanyahu's statements, statements from his cabinet, the IDF, the ICJ court arguments, and conditions on the ground, I think the Israeli govt, at least at one point, intended (intent) to wipe the Palestinians out. Genocide.

I'd guess they walk that back a little now considering they got taken to the Hague and the world is paying more attention than they were last fall. I hope that's the case, but maybe not. Time will tell.


Robert, what I think and what I can argue are different things. I don’t think Netanyahu intends to wipe out all Palestinians but I do think he was quoting Samuel to stiffen the resolve of the Israelis. He knew of course that to completely wipe out Hamas (Amalek) many innocents would be killed by IDF. I think he was rallying the nation. I can’t give you honest arguments. I can only tell you what I think and what I believe. I can see why people would think otherwise and I don’t have any way or any desire to change anyone’s mind on the subject. If I thought I truly had an answer then I would have an argument for it. But for now, I can only go with what I think and believe. I hope that makes some sense.
119. Author: RobertHivelyDate: Tue, 4/23/2024, 8:30PM EST
jeebling wrote:
Robert, what I think and what I can argue are different things. I don’t think Netanyahu intends to wipe out all Palestinians but I do think he was quoting Samuel to stiffen the resolve of the Israelis. He knew of course that to completely wipe out Hamas (Amalek) many innocents would be killed by IDF. I think he was rallying the nation. I can’t give you honest arguments. I can only tell you what I think and what I believe. I can see why people would think otherwise and I don’t have any way or any desire to change anyone’s mind on the subject. If I thought I truly had an answer then I would have an argument for it. But for now, I can only go with what I think and believe. I hope that makes some sense.


I mentioned something like that on page two, post #48. I said maybe it's just political rhetoric but it sounds pretty "genocidey" to me. I know you learn toward rhetoric and I lean toward intent on genocide. Only time will tell.

I base what I think on hundreds of years of military history. This wouldn't be the first genocide rodeo, nor the last.


120. Author: jeeblingDate: Tue, 4/23/2024, 8:44PM EST
I agree that it does sound pretty “genocidey” and that society has recent and ancient examples of genocide. If it turns out that I’m wrong then I’ll feel like a dupe but that will be the least of problems. I don’t think Netanyahu would make a speech with thinly veiled threats (intent) of genocide. That would be a stupid thing for him to do politically and diplomatically. But then the question of , will then why did he say such a thing in a prepared speech?, is left to be guessed at. And, as I mentioned, I do understand why people think that genocide is underway. Maybe I’m right. Maybe I’m gullible.
121. Author: Speyside2Date: Wed, 4/24/2024, 4:10AM EST
NIV. Now go, attack the Amalekites and totally destroy[a] all that belongs to them. Do not spare them; put to death men and women, children and infants, cattle and sheep, camels and donkeys.’” No mention of Bible is there?
122. Author: Speyside2Date: Wed, 4/24/2024, 4:10AM EST
NIV. Now go, attack the Amalekites and totally destroy[a] all that belongs to them. Do not spare them; put to death men and women, children and infants, cattle and sheep, camels and donkeys.’” No mention of Bible is there?
123. Author: Speyside2Date: Wed, 4/24/2024, 4:18AM EST
NLT. Now go and completely destroy the entire Amalekite nation—men, women, children, babies, cattle, sheep, goats, camels, and donkeys.” No mention of the word Bible.
124. Author: Speyside2Date: Wed, 4/24/2024, 4:23AM EST
King James. Now go and smite Amalek, and utterly destroy all that they have, and spare them not; but slay both man and woman, infant and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ass. No mention of the word Bible.

Enjoy, you will still say the word Bible is used based on your internet and YouTube research. Again, I would suggest reading Samuel 15:3 in and of those versions of the Bible, even on the internet.
125. Author: AbrignacDate: Wed, 4/24/2024, 5:11AM EST
Speyside2 wrote:
King James. Now go and smite Amalek, and utterly destroy all that they have, and spare them not; but slay both man and woman, infant and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ass. No mention of the word Bible.

Enjoy, you will still say the word Bible is used based on your internet and YouTube research. Again, I would suggest reading Samuel 15:3 in and of those versions of the Bible, even on the internet.


What is your point?
126. Author: Speyside2Date: Wed, 4/24/2024, 7:26AM EST
The quote that Netanyahu said was " Remember what Amalek did to you.". This is 6 specific words found in Deuteronomy 25:19. Also, Netanyahu said our holy scriptures. Those 6 words are used in at least 1 Holocaust Museum, and a Holocaust memorial near The Hague. Certainly, in these 2 locations the words are not taken to mean genocide of Germanic people, also the word Bible was never used. I was hoping RH would do enough research on his own to learn this. I tried not to call him out on the fact that using Samuel 15:3 is incorrect. I felt this would be somewhat nasty. Though anyone using Dave's Killer Bread is talking about ancient history in my opinion. That was originally a reference about me being nasty on here. He is someone who does not follow the crowd just because they are the crowd. While I disagree with many of his opinions, I can still respect them. His opinion on this is at least based in part on irresponsible news reporting. I assume this is to promote their own agenda. So, in turn I would ask why you are interested in what my point is? If you feel the need to verify what I am saying is correct, then do a deep dive into this. While not obvious because of the massive disinformation it can none the less be found.
127. Author: RobertHivelyDate: Wed, 4/24/2024, 3:28PM EST
Speyside2 wrote:
The quote that Netanyahu said was " Remember what Amalek did to you.". This is 6 specific words found in Deuteronomy 25:19. Also, Netanyahu said our holy scriptures. Those 6 words are used in at least 1 Holocaust Museum, and a Holocaust memorial near The Hague. Certainly, in these 2 locations the words are not taken to mean genocide of Germanic people, also the word Bible was never used. I was hoping RH would do enough research on his own to learn this. I tried not to call him out on the fact that using Samuel 15:3 is incorrect. I felt this would be somewhat nasty. Though anyone using Dave's Killer Bread is talking about ancient history in my opinion. That was originally a reference about me being nasty on here. He is someone who does not follow the crowd just because they are the crowd. While I disagree with many of his opinions, I can still respect them. His opinion on this is at least based in part on irresponsible news reporting. I assume this is to promote their own agenda. So, in turn I would ask why you are interested in what my point is? If you feel the need to verify what I am saying is correct, then do a deep dive into this. While not obvious because of the massive disinformation it can none the less be found.



Did you read the article? You couldn't have. The author is saying "our bible". They're his words. Not from the bible. He said, and quoting "our Bible" then goes on to the Samuel quote.

Hively Post #2: "I simply do not support Israel's genocide of the Palestinians whatsoever, and I'm not a "far-left agitator and Islamist-sympathizing activist." Just a guy that doesn't enjoy seeing an entire group of people being wiped off of the earth."

That's what the last section of Deuteronomy 25 indeed says: "Therefore it shall be, when the Lord your God has given you rest from your enemies all around, in the land which the Lord your God is giving you to possess as an inheritance, that you will blot out the remembrance of Amalek from under heaven."

If that's what you, Fenster, DMV, ZRX and Stogie think, then own it. Join up, strap up, go kill some women, children and Hamas. Kill em all. But on the other hand, spare me the "western enlightenment" and religious reformation speech.

I couldn't believe that's what Israel used as a defense. Bc it, too, called for "Amalek" to be wiped off the earth. Lol Holiday/museum quote or not...

Also, I mentioned all of that (post #2) before Ray posted the article with the Samuel quote. So, no matter which Amalek reference you think Netanyahu used, in this context (of war) they are both veiled genocidal threats, or as Jeebs argued, dangerous political rhetoric. And as I said, time will tell.

And for the record, ever since the Cbid Covid Wars, I'm not interested in your opinion about anything. I'm not interested in your opinion specifically, not everybody that disagreed with me about "Covid".

I don't like talking to you in general. If I want to know your opinion I'll ask Fenster. Why do you care, at all, what my opinion is on the happenings in the newest theater of WW3? I'm just a Qbert, remember?

You couldn't even wrap your mind around the fact that Thomas Di Lorenzo was the one that said "Our Bible", not Samuel and certainly not me. I think he was kinda trolling Bibi there or maybe it was a typo. I don't care either way.

I didn't even post the article, Ray did. Why don't you make a thread about blocking him for his thought crimes. Oh that's right, you already did.
128. Author: Stogie1020Date: Wed, 4/24/2024, 4:51PM EST
Robert, I have not seen you decry the genocidal threats (or actions, frankly) of Hamas at all, just some veiled biblical reference no one can agree on by Bibi.

The premise of this thread (and more specifically your initial reply) was that Israel is comitting genocide. Do you actually believe that? Do you believe that Hamas wants to wipe the earth of Israel and all Israelis?
129. Author: jeeblingDate: Wed, 4/24/2024, 7:36PM EST
Speyside2 wrote:
The quote that Netanyahu said was " Remember what Amalek did to you.". This is 6 specific words found in Deuteronomy 25:19. Also, Netanyahu said our holy scriptures. Those 6 words are used in at least 1 Holocaust Museum, and a Holocaust memorial near The Hague. Certainly, in these 2 locations the words are not taken to mean genocide of Germanic people, also the word Bible was never used. I was hoping RH would do enough research on his own to learn this. I tried not to call him out on the fact that using Samuel 15:3 is incorrect. I felt this would be somewhat nasty. Though anyone using Dave's Killer Bread is talking about ancient history in my opinion. That was originally a reference about me being nasty on here. He is someone who does not follow the crowd just because they are the crowd. While I disagree with many of his opinions, I can still respect them. His opinion on this is at least based in part on irresponsible news reporting. I assume this is to promote their own agenda. So, in turn I would ask why you are interested in what my point is? If you feel the need to verify what I am saying is correct, then do a deep dive into this. While not obvious because of the massive disinformation it can none the less be found.


This is an excellent summary and the details do matter. The nitty gritty details make a difference when we are talking about Netanyahu and if his intent is genocide. Not that you need my help with your comment. I guess I’m just saying thanks for telling me something I didn’t know.
130. Author: jeeblingDate: Wed, 4/24/2024, 7:45PM EST
RobertHively wrote:
Did you read the article? You couldn't have. The author is saying "our bible". They're his words. Not from the bible. He said, and quoting "our Bible" then goes on to the Samuel quote.

Hively Post #2: "I simply do not support Israel's genocide of the Palestinians whatsoever, and I'm not a "far-left agitator and Islamist-sympathizing activist." Just a guy that doesn't enjoy seeing an entire group of people being wiped off of the earth."

That's what the last section of Deuteronomy 25 indeed says: "Therefore it shall be, when the Lord your God has given you rest from your enemies all around, in the land which the Lord your God is giving you to possess as an inheritance, that you will blot out the remembrance of Amalek from under heaven."

If that's what you, Fenster, DMV, ZRX and Stogie think, then own it. Join up, strap up, go kill some women, children and Hamas. Kill em all. But on the other hand, spare me the "western enlightenment" and religious reformation speech.

I couldn't believe that's what Israel used as a defense. Bc it, too, called for "Amalek" to be wiped off the earth. Lol Holiday/museum quote or not...

Also, I mentioned all of that (post #2) before Ray posted the article with the Samuel quote. So, no matter which Amalek reference you think Netanyahu used, in this context (of war) they are both veiled genocidal threats, or as Jeebs argued, dangerous political rhetoric. And as I said, time will tell.

And for the record, ever since the Cbid Covid Wars, I'm not interested in your opinion about anything. I'm not interested in your opinion specifically, not everybody that disagreed with me about "Covid".

I don't like talking to you in general. If I want to know your opinion I'll ask Fenster. Why do you care, at all, what my opinion is on the happenings in the newest theater of WW3? I'm just a Qbert, remember?

You couldn't even wrap your mind around the fact that Thomas Di Lorenzo was the one that said "Our Bible", not Samuel and certainly not me. I think he was kinda trolling Bibi there or maybe it was a typo. I don't care either way.

I didn't even post the article, Ray did. Why don't you make a thread about blocking him for his thought crimes. Oh that's right, you already did.



Robert, you have cogent and thoughtful points. I hope you and I will be able to discuss thorny topics in the future. I respect your point of view and I’d like to hear more of it in the future. Maybe there will be a subject that I know more about and can mount a valid argument to engage you with. I think I’m going to bail out of this thread soon, respectfully. Peace to you brother.
131. Author: rfenstDate: Wed, 4/24/2024, 8:08PM EST
RobertHively wrote:
Just a guy that doesn't enjoy seeing an entire group of people being wiped off of the earth."

blot out the remembrance of Amalek from under heaven."

If I want to know your opinion I'll ask Fenster.

1. "... Little Boy was dropped on Hiroshima. Three days later, a Fat Man was dropped on Nagasaki. Over the next two to four months, the effects of the atomic bombings killed 90,000 to 146,000 people in Hiroshima and 60,000 to 80,000 people in Nagasaki; roughly half occurred on the first day.

2. God was not always nice. He gave instructions to smite peoples, take lands with violence, allowed enslavement of, and wars against the Israelites. He meted harsh penalties for violation of his laws and orders, eg. Adam & Eve, every one who wasn't on Noah's Ark, Sodom and Gamora and instructions to Moses what to do to take the "promised land'; etc., etc.

3. A war wiping out the leadership of an enemy who vows destruction of a country and the killing of all its people; shoots thousands of missiles/rockets; and that also has recently attacked across the border with over 1,000 people killed and hundreds of others taken hostage- back into enemy territory for six months; has the right to route out its enemies' leadership and military and find the hostages as necessary to strengthen its border and reduce risk/chance of another outbreak of war for as long as possible. It is a defensive war to uphold/strengthen its border Such a war is JUST WAR IN MY OPINION.

It's up to Hamas to save its people from the calamity it caused to come down on them- before a more controlled, known to be oncoming, onslaught. They can resign, surrender, leave the enemy territory permanently, to save their people or risk death to too manyl.

3. As to "ask Fenster" you do not know much of my opinions.
132. Author: AbrignacDate: Wed, 4/24/2024, 8:51PM EST
Speyside2 wrote:
The quote that Netanyahu said was " Remember what Amalek did to you.". This is 6 specific words found in Deuteronomy 25:19. Also, Netanyahu said our holy scriptures. Those 6 words are used in at least 1 Holocaust Museum, and a Holocaust memorial near The Hague. Certainly, in these 2 locations the words are not taken to mean genocide of Germanic people, also the word Bible was never used. I was hoping RH would do enough research on his own to learn this. I tried not to call him out on the fact that using Samuel 15:3 is incorrect. I felt this would be somewhat nasty. Though anyone using Dave's Killer Bread is talking about ancient history in my opinion. That was originally a reference about me being nasty on here. He is someone who does not follow the crowd just because they are the crowd. While I disagree with many of his opinions, I can still respect them. His opinion on this is at least based in part on irresponsible news reporting. I assume this is to promote their own agenda. So, in turn I would ask why you are interested in what my point is? If you feel the need to verify what I am saying is correct, then do a deep dive into this. While not obvious because of the massive disinformation it can none the less be found.



Whoosh. That the sound of what I was asking going over your head.

Hively quoted an article that said Bibi used biblical language. You made a point of calling him and telling him to do his research because Bibi would not use biblical language since he is Jewish. However, Hively never stated in first person that Bibi was doing so. He simply quoted someone else. So your rant was meaningless.

On the other hand I recall you speaking earlier in the thread regarding how certain parts of the Torah became books of the Bible. If in fact Bibi quoted from the Torah a passage that is also found in the Bible it is as accurate to say that he used Biblical language as it is to say he used language from the Torah.

133. Author: rfenstDate: Thu, 4/25/2024, 9:49AM EST
Abrignac wrote:
Whoosh. That the sound of what I was asking going over your head.

Hively quoted an article that said Bibi used biblical language. You made a point of calling him and telling him to do his research because Bibi would not use biblical language since he is Jewish. However, Hively never stated in first person that Bibi was doing so. He simply quoted someone else. So your rant was meaningless.

On the other hand I recall you speaking earlier in the thread regarding how certain parts of the Torah became books of the Bible. If in fact Bibi quoted from the Torah a passage that is also found in the Bible it is as accurate to say that he used Biblical language as it is to say he used language from the Torah.


ONE POINT: JEWS DO NOT INCLUDE THE NEW TESTAMENT IN ANY ASPECT OF RELIGION OR THEOLOGY.
We don't call anything the Old Testament for religious purpose.
Jews refer to Torah and Judaic interpretations. That's all.
134. Author: Stogie1020Date: Mon, 5/13/2024, 10:53AM EST
Further evidence that Israel is terrible at "Genociding"...

https://www.newsmax.com/world/globaltalk/israel-war-un/2024/05/13/id/1164462/

UN Blames 'Fog of War' for Overcounting of Gazan Child Deaths

Quote:
The United Nations now claims that "the fog of war" is to blame for a major overstatement of the number of Gazan children who have been killed in the war.

In mid-March, the U.N. Children's Fund stated that 13,450 children had been killed in Gaza, citing figures from the Hamas-run Gazan Health Ministry. Catherine Russell, the director of UNICEF, said in a television interview on March 17 that those numbers were "staggering" and "really shocking."

"We haven't seen that rate of death among children in almost any other conflict in the world," Russell claimed at the time.

The statistic was cited frequently in the international press, leading to accusations that Israel had committed war crimes, including targeting babies and children intentionally.

Even Hamas has since admitted that those numbers turn out to be off by at least 40%. The United Nations revised its numbers last week, without providing an explanation.

"When it comes to Israel, it's clear that the U.N.'s goal is not accuracy, but rather to immediately seize on any report, no matter how unsubstantiated or even manifestly false, in order to portray Israel as malevolent," Hillel Neuer, executive director of UN Watch, told JNS.

"The right thing for the U.N. to do now would be to admit that their casualty count in Gaza is a complete failure," Neuer added.

Last Wednesday, the U.N. Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) released updated casualty figures. Some 7,797 Gazan children had died in the war as of April 30, it said — a roughly 42% drop from the mid-March numbers.

It also revised its casualty figures for women by nearly a half — from more than 9,500 to fewer than 5,000.


In a little-noticed change, OCHA differentiated in its new figures between "reported" and "identified" fatalities, including the 7,797 children figure in the "identified" category.

Using OCHA's math, out of 10,158 reported but unidentified casualties, 5,653 (56%) would have to be children to add up to the figures published in mid-March. That would be far more than is indicated by the information the United Nations released last week, which claims that children make up 32% of the identified deaths in Gaza.

JNS asked Farhan Haq, deputy spokesman for U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres, at a press conference on Friday why the math doesn't add up.

"The revisions are taken … you know, of course, in the fog of war, it's difficult to come up with numbers," Haq told JNS. "We get numbers from different sources on the ground, and then we try to cross-check them. As we cross-check them, we update the numbers, and we'll continue to do that as that progresses."

Salo Aizenberg, an independent scholar and author and HonestReporting board member, told JNS that "It's absolutely true that the fog of war makes it difficult to assess casualties, but this was the case from the beginning of the war."

"It's outrageous that only seven months later, the U.N. is questioning the Hamas-supplied casualty numbers," he said.

In early April, the Gaza Health Ministry said it had "incomplete data" for 11,371 of the 33,091 Palestinian fatalities it claimed to have documented at the time. The ministry later said it did not have names for more than 10,000 of the Gazans it claimed were killed in the war.

The ministry has not revealed publicly how it compiles its published information. No independent media exists in Gaza to try to verify it.

"For reporting Gaza deaths, there is no method and no standard of proof," Neuer told JNS. "All the U.N. does is parrot figures supplied by Hamas, which is laundered and legitimized by the U.N. as the neutral-sounding 'Gaza Ministry of Health,' or 'Government Media Office,' when in fact both are run by the Hamas terrorist organization."

"Now that the U.N. has suddenly reduced some of the figures by half, they've essentially admitted to have been feeding the media and the world completely false numbers," he said.
As recently as last month, the Hamas-run government media office has repeated claims that 70% of the deceased were women and children.


Haq, the U.N. spokesman, told JNS that "Numbers get adjusted many times over the course of a conflict. Once a conflict is done, we'll have the most accurate figures."

But Aizenberg's research has shown that "For many months, there have been obvious errors identified in the numbers published daily by OCHA, which are ultimately based on Hamas reporting," the scholar told JNS.

Aizenberg pointed to an immediate claim by Hamas of nearly 500 deaths in an Oct. 17 strike on Al-Ahli Arab Hospital in Gaza, which turned out to be a Palestinian rocket misfire and evidence suggests a drastically lower death total. Still, Hamas hasn't corrected its initial tally.

His analysis has also revealed that Hamas reported on certain days in the first months of the war that more women and children were killed than the total number of all fatalities.

"We're just going with what we can absolutely confirm, which will always be the low end of what the numbers are," Haq, the U.N. spokesman, told JNS on Friday.

Abraham Wyner, a professor of statistics and data science at the University of Pennsylvania, published a statistical analysis two months ago that showed how Hamas faked casualty numbers.

The Washington Institute for Near East Policy also released a report in January showing major discrepancies in the fatality reports, concluding they were most likely caused by manipulation.

"While it's better late than never that the U.N. finally admits that the casualty numbers issued by Hamas for the last 200 days are not reliable, the false data has infiltrated everywhere," Aizenberg told JNS.

He cited U.S. President Joe Biden's claim in his March 7 State of the Union address that "more than 30,000 Palestinians have been killed."

The U.S. State and Defense Departments have also used that statistic officially, apparently relying on Hamas data.

Neuer told JNS that "If U.N. officials continue to legitimize a Hamas-run system that has now proven itself to be completely false, they will be complicit with terrorist propaganda."

The revised Hamas casualty numbers, taken together with Israel Defense Forces claims of terrorists killed—a distinction Hamas does not make —"demonstrate that the civilian/casualty rate in Gaza is likely 1:1 or lower, which would amount to the lowest ratio in the history of urban combat, starkly contradicting any notion of indiscriminate IDF attacks," Aizenberg told JNS.

JNS asked Haq on Friday if U.N. figures can be considered reliable.

"You can consider them reliable from the fact that we're continually checking them," he said. "We'll continue to do that over the course of the war. But the numbers, you know, ultimately have to be regularly checked so that we can be sure that what we're putting out is valid."

In Jan. 2014, the U.N. Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights announced it had stopped updating the death toll from Syria's civil war, as it could no longer verify the sources of information.
135. Author: Speyside2Date: Mon, 5/13/2024, 11:18AM EST
Aledgedly pro-Hamas college rioters have stated 5,000,000 Gazens have been murdered.
136. Author: RobertHivelyDate: Mon, 5/13/2024, 8:39PM EST
Stogie1020 wrote:
Further evidence that Israel is terrible at "Genociding"...

https://www.newsmax.com/world/globaltalk/israel-war-un/2024/05/13/id/1164462/

UN Blames 'Fog of War' for Overcounting of Gazan Child Deaths




"While it's better late than never that the U.N. finally admits that the casualty numbers issued by Hamas for the last 200 days are not reliable, the false data has infiltrated everywhere," Aizenberg told JNS.

I mentioned that to you in that PM I sent you a week or so ago. I see that on the right, left and from the mainstream media-everywhere.

Turns out, according to this article, the DOD is even using the 30,000+ number. "The U.S. State and Defense Departments have also used that statistic officially, apparently relying on Hamas data."

Why? They are supporting Israel militarily. It makes no sense.
137. Author: Stogie1020Date: Mon, 5/13/2024, 9:33PM EST
RobertHively wrote:
"While it's better late than never that the U.N. finally admits that the casualty numbers issued by Hamas for the last 200 days are not reliable, the false data has infiltrated everywhere," Aizenberg told JNS.

I mentioned that to you in that PM I sent you a week or so ago. I see that on the right, left and from the mainstream media-everywhere.

Turns out, according to this article, the DOD is even using the 30,000+ number. "The U.S. State and Defense Departments have also used that statistic officially, apparently relying on Hamas data."

Why? They are supporting Israel militarily. It makes no sense.

I agree, it makes no sense. The UN basically put their stamp of approval on unverified claims made by a terrorist organization's PR arm... The U.S., too.

Honestly, the reason is simple. Some people will jump on any excuse to bash Israel/Jews. It's just that simple. Jews? Bash them. It's been going on for a few thousand years for some reason, so I guess it's to be expected, but still, it infuriates.
138. Author: Speyside2Date: Wed, 5/15/2024, 8:01AM EST
Information needs to be third party verification with the third party having no agenda. This is the only way to find truth. I care about innocent people dying. One question I have is the percentage of Hamas/militarily active supporters killed to innocent people being killed. I can find no verifiable information on this. Bibi says about 1 to 1. If true, this is the best number in any war that has ever happened. As I find this statistic nowhere else, I question its accuracy. Israel has the ability to destroy entire countries. Only Saudi Arabia and perhaps Jordan do. Based on their advanced American weapons. Iran has hardware store quality stuff and Russian defensive systems do not work. Israel has proven this. Iran and Russia are still third world countries no matter how vehemently they disagree. I also wonder about the quality of Chinese weapons based on their substandard manufacturing. Biden wants to send 1 billion dollars of munitions rounds, mostly tank rounds to Israel. I like this idea. This war can only be won on the ground in my opinion. As far as the Gazans, let any other non-terrorist mid-eastern country take them after a complete vetting by Israel. It has been proven to me that the withheld bunker buster bombs will not end this war. We should be sending directional force bombs instead which would have greater effectiveness and cause fewer civilian casualties.
139. Author: Speyside2Date: Wed, 5/15/2024, 8:03AM EST
RH, I think the above would partially create what you hope to see happen.
140. Author: AbrignacDate: Wed, 5/15/2024, 11:49AM EST
Didn’t matter how many non-combatants were killed in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Why the outrage now?
141. Author: DrMaddVibeDate: Wed, 5/15/2024, 12:46PM EST
RobertHively wrote:
Turns out, according to this article, the DOD is even using the 30,000+ number. "The U.S. State and Defense Departments have also used that statistic officially, apparently relying on Hamas data."

Why? They are supporting Israel militarily. It makes no sense.



This is roughly the equivalent of using al-Qaeda propaganda in the middle of the invasion of Afghanistan or repeating Russian information in a Christmas message to Europe.

Last week, the United Nations Office for Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs dramatically revised casualties, halving its child fatality numbers from an imaginary 14,500 deaths to an imaginary 7,797 and its women fatalities from 9,500 deaths to 4,959 deaths. These seem like pretty big discrepancies.

You know why that happens? Because it is all just made up.

Yet, in February, when anti-Israel Rep. Ro Khanna asked Lloyd Austin, “How many Palestinian women and children have been killed by Israel since Oct. 7?” the secretary of defense answered, “It’s over 25,000.”

https://thefederalist.com/2024/05/14/how-the-media-and-democrats-helped-create-the-israeli-genocide-lie/


When they're lying they don't need to make sense. They only want to obfuscate from the reality that on October 7th 2023 a terrorist organization willingly invaded a sovereign nation and committed acts of terrorism that included the rapes of women and babies, murder of over 1000 civilians that were going about their daily lives, kidnapping of civilians as well. Let's not forget those facts. Israel has had to deal with terrorism on it's doorstep and windowsill each and every day since 1948.

You are witnessing a US administration funding the Iranian backed terrorists and slow walking the ability for Israel to end the madness forever. All while giving a Neo-Nazis haven all the money, weaponry and support (all for kicking up 10% to the Big Guy!Angel ) it can muster on the World stage with ZERO accountability. All to support a nation that broke a treaty with military implications.

So, it makes perfect sense when you're running a nation like a criminal empire.
142. Author: DrMaddVibeDate: Wed, 5/15/2024, 1:08PM EST
Look at what a POS our President is...sounds great on the headline...but wait...

Biden administration is moving ahead on new $1 billion arms sale to Israel, congressional aides say



WASHINGTON – The Biden administration has told key lawmakers it plans to move forward on a new $1 billion sale of arms and ammunition to Israel, three congressional aides say.

It's the first arms shipment to Israel to be pushed ahead since the administration put another arms transfer, consisting of 3,500 bombs of up to 2,000 pounds each, on hold this month. The Biden administration, citing concern for civilian casualties in Gaza, has said it paused that bomb transfer to keep Israel from using those particular munitions in its offensive in the crowded southern Gaza city of Rafah.

The new package disclosed Tuesday includes about $700 million for tank ammunition, $500 million in tactical vehicles and $60 million in mortar rounds, the congressional aides said. They spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss an arms transfer that has not yet been made public.

The administration's notice to lawmakers this week isn't the final, formal notification before a sale, one of the congressional aides said. The deal would be an entirely new sale, the aide said. That means any weapons that are part of it could take years to be delivered.

Once a transfer is informally notified to Congress, the leaders of the House Foreign Affairs Committee or the Senate Foreign Relations Committee can block it by placing a hold on the package, and the State Department generally will not proceed if that occurs.

The Biden administration has come under criticism from both sides of the political spectrum over its military support for Israel's now seven-month-old war against Hamas in Gaza — at a time when President Joe Biden is battling for reelection against former President Donald Trump.

Some of Biden's fellow Democrats have pushed him to limit transfers of offensive weapons to Israel to pressure the U.S. ally to do more to protect Palestinian civilians. Protests on college campuses around the U.S. have driven home the message this spring.

Republican lawmakers have seized on the administration's pause on the bomb transfers, saying any lessening of U.S. support for Israel — its closest ally in the Middle East — weakens that country as it fights Hamas and other Iran-backed groups. In the House, they are planning to advance a bill this week to mandate the delivery of offensive weaponry for Israel.

Rep. Tom Emmer, R-Minn., the GOP whip, told reporters Wednesday that initiating the process for this round of arms sales “doesn’t make up” for the Biden administration withholding the previously approved sales.

Despite the onetime suspension of a bomb shipment, Biden and administration officials have made clear they will continue other weapons deliveries and overall military support to Israel, which is the largest recipient of U.S. military aid.

Biden will see to it that “Israel has all of the military means it needs to defend itself against all of its enemies, including Hamas,” national security spokesman John Kirby told reporters Monday. “For him, this is very straightforward: He’s going to continue to provide Israel with all of capabilities it needs, but he does not want certain categories of American weapons used in a particular type of operation in a particular place. And again, he has been clear and consistent with that.”

The Wall Street Journal first reported the plans for the $1 billion weapons package to Israel.

In response to House Republicans' plan to move forward with a bill to mandate the delivery of offensive weapons for Israel, the White House said Tuesday that Biden would veto the bill if it were to pass Congress.

The bill has practically no chance in the Democratic-controlled Senate. But House Democrats are somewhat divided on the issue, and roughly two dozen have signed onto a letter to the Biden administration saying they were “deeply concerned about the message” sent by pausing the bomb shipment.

One of the letter’s signers, New York Rep. Ritchie Torres, said he would likely vote for the bill, despite the White House’s opposition.

“I have a general rule of supporting pro-Israel legislation unless it includes a poison pill — like cuts to domestic policy,” he said.

In addition to the written veto threat, the White House has been in touch with various lawmakers and congressional aides about the legislation, according to an administration official.

“We strongly, strongly oppose attempts to constrain the President’s ability to deploy U.S. security assistance consistent with U.S. foreign policy and national security objectives,” White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said this week, adding that the administration plans to spend “every last cent” appropriated by Congress in the national security supplemental package that was signed into law by Biden last month.

https://www.wsls.com/news/world/2024/05/15/biden-administration-is-moving-ahead-on-1-billion-arms-package-for-israel-ap-sources-say/



Years. Does Ukraine have this same leash? **** NO! There's ZERO ACCOUNTABILITY with them!
143. Author: jeeblingDate: Wed, 5/15/2024, 1:19PM EST
The DNC trying to win back some credibility with a sleight of hand and media spin.
144. Author: rfenstDate: Wed, 5/15/2024, 1:39PM EST
Speyside2 wrote:
Information needs to be third party verification with the third party having no agenda. This is the only way to find truth. I care about innocent people dying. One question I have is the percentage of Hamas/militarily active supporters killed to innocent people being killed. I can find no verifiable information on this. Bibi says about 1 to 1. If true, this is the best number in any war that has ever happened. As I find this statistic nowhere else, I question its accuracy. Israel has the ability to destroy entire countries. Only Saudi Arabia and perhaps Jordan do. Based on their advanced American weapons. Iran has hardware store quality stuff and Russian defensive systems do not work. Israel has proven this. Iran and Russia are still third world countries no matter how vehemently they disagree. I also wonder about the quality of Chinese weapons based on their substandard manufacturing. Biden wants to send 1 billion dollars of munitions rounds, mostly tank rounds to Israel. I like this idea. This war can only be won on the ground in my opinion. As far as Hamas, let any other non-terrorist mid-eastern country take them after a complete vetting by Israel. It has been proven to me that the withheld bunker buster bombs will not end this war. We should be sending directional force bombs instead which would have greater effectiveness and cause fewer civilian casualties.

FIFY.
No such place any more. The nomenclature has changed.

145. Author: rfenstDate: Wed, 5/15/2024, 1:43PM EST
Abrignac wrote:
Didn’t matter how many non-combatants were killed in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Why the outrage now?

Exactly.
Better yet, look at the post-bombing photos for the degree of total destruction.
146. Author: jeeblingDate: Wed, 5/15/2024, 2:00PM EST
https://www.latimes.com/world/asia/la-na-japan-hiroshima-apology-20160429-story.html

“ In 2007, during Shinzo Abe’s first term as prime minister, Defense Minister Fumio Kyuma referred to the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki as “something that couldn’t be helped.”
147. Author: DrMaddVibeDate: Wed, 5/15/2024, 2:14PM EST
rfenst wrote:
Exactly.
Better yet, look at the post-bombing photos for the degree of total destruction.



And that is why America was the FA & FO World Champion. They hit Pearl Harbor. Played the war the way they wanted to till we invented some new toys and told them we had a "game changer". Told 'em to surrender and they didn't. So Little Boy tore 'em a new ass. Told 'em to surrender again and they didn't. Japan met Fat Man. They were on Big Mo less than a month later giving Mac Arthur their autographs. Begs the question why did they need to be asked twice?
148. Author: rfenstDate: Wed, 5/15/2024, 2:47PM EST
DrMaddVibe wrote:
And that is why America was the FA & FO World Champion. They hit Pearl Harbor. Played the war the way they wanted to till we invented some new toys and told them we had a "game changer". Told 'em to surrender and they didn't. So Little Boy tore 'em a new ass. Told 'em to surrender again and they didn't. Japan met Fat Man. They were on Big Mo less than a month later giving Mac Arthur their autographs. Begs the question why did they need to be asked twice?
.
Japanese mind: Failure is not an option. Forge forward. Do not stop until you win.
That's why they beat-out the U.S. car manufacturers...
149. Author: rfenstDate: Wed, 5/15/2024, 3:12PM EST
Opinion Enough mediating. America should deploy its might against Hamas.
The United States should exert maximum pressure on the terrorists to free its citizens.



WAPO Opinion: By Roger Zakheim

On Oct. 7, Hamas murdered more than 40 Americans, and five Americans are still being held captive more than 200 days later. Since then, the Biden administration has tried to get the hostages home by playing the role of mediator. This approach fundamentally misunderstands the parties involved in the conflict, as well as the tools required to free captive Americans. The mediator mind-set is wrong in principle and has now failed in practice. It is time to jettison this approach and deploy U.S. might instead.

For more than seven months the secretary of state and director of central intelligence, along with other senior officials, have treated the Gaza war as if it were a conflict between state actors, employing shuttle diplomacy and negotiating with both sides. They have indulged in the conceit that you can negotiate with a terrorist organization by treating it as an equal party. The Biden administration has continued to allow Qatar to give Hamas’s political leadership sanctuary in its five-star headquarters in Doha, on the theory that if they can talk with Hamas leaders, a resolution is more likely.

Yet the mediator approach has applied equal, if not more, pressure on U.S. ally Israel to make concessions than it has on Hamas, the original aggressors, and its principal backer, Iran. This has hardened Hamas’s negotiating stance and imperiled American hostages.

Other than the week-long pause in fighting at the end of 2023, during which 105 hostages (only two Americans) were released, U.S. mediation has achieved little. Hamas’s recent video of American hostage Hersh Goldberg-Polin is a harrowing reminder of how badly we have failed our citizens.

It is long overdue for the United States to shift the paradigm. Over the past 20 years, the United States has developed an array of intelligence, economic, and military tools and techniques that can pressure and destroy terrorist networks. They should be deployed against Hamas.

For starters, the Treasury Department should aggressively target sanctions on entities that fund and fuel Hamas. At the top of the list should be the Central Bank of Iran, which facilitates capital flows into Hamas’s coffers. The same should be done for Qatari and Turkish entities that support and aid the terrorist organization. This should be paired with flexing our diplomatic muscle and formally demanding that Qatar oust Hamas’s leadership from Doha.

We should also unleash our military and intelligence community’s world-class targeting and strike capability that killed Osama bin Laden and Qasem Soleimani, and has rescued hundreds of hostages held by terrorists. The rescue of American citizens certainly warrants the employment of unparalleled U.S. intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance assets, as well as elite Special Operations forces. Yet, since Oct. 7 the U.S. military is nowhere to be found. Instead of fully utilizing this exquisite capability, only a handful of military advisers are whispering advice to Israeli counterparts in Tel Aviv.

Skeptics may argue that the chances of any U.S. intelligence and military success in Gaza are low. If the Israel Defense Forces have been unable to find the hostages, how could the U.S. military expect a different result?

Such skeptics underestimate our formidable capabilities. At an operational level, having a modest but lethal U.S. intelligence and military footprint dedicated to targeting Hamas and rescuing Americans will help an Israeli war effort that is exhausted from seven months of fighting. As one IDF special operator told me, “Your Delta forces would be a game changer.”

And shifting away from mediation to a more aggressive stance would also send a powerful signal to Hamas’s leadership: that the United States will hold Hamas directly responsible for how it treats American citizens. That is a message best delivered by the barrel of a gun, not through intermediaries in Cairo and Doha. It could change the negotiation incentives for Hamas’s leadership.

Oct. 7 was one of the deadliest days for Americans since 9/11. And yet President Biden has found it more expedient to treat Hamas as Israel’s enemy — not the United States’. At this point in the war, we are doing a disservice to our citizens by relying solely on Israel to handle what should be the primary U.S. interest in Gaza: saving American lives. It is time to demonstrate that the United States does not leave its citizens behind. There is no higher calling or priority in U.S. foreign policy.


Roger Zakheim is director of the Ronald Reagan Institute, a former general counsel for the House Armed Services Committee and a member of the National Defense Strategy Commission.
150. Author: DrMaddVibeDate: Wed, 5/15/2024, 3:17PM EST
rfenst wrote:
.
Japanese mind: Failure is not an option. Forge forward. Do not stop until you win.
That's why they beat-out the U.S. car manufacturers...



So, they surrendered because they wanted to topple Detroit?
FirstPrev1234NextLast
Sign In to Reply
Next TopicJump to TopPrev Topic